Using churn as a strategic asset — a board perspective
For boards, churn should never be viewed as an operational metric alone. It is a strategic signal about product relevance, execution quality, and market fit.
High churn rarely means “customers are unhappy” in general. It usually means something more specific:
- The company is selling to the wrong segment
- Customers don’t reach value fast enough
- The product solves a problem, but not a critical one
- Expectations set in sales are not matched in delivery
Boards should push management to use churn systematically:
- Require structured churn analysis, not anecdotes
- Review churn by cohort, segment, and lifecycle stage
- Distinguish between healthy churn (bad fit) and unhealthy churn (value leakage)
- Ensure churn insights drive concrete changes in product, onboarding, pricing, and ICP
Churn also tests organizational maturity.
Companies that learn from churn have tight feedback loops between sales, product, and customer success. Companies that don’t tend to optimize growth metrics while value quietly erodes.
The board’s role is not to demand “lower churn at all costs,” but to ask better questions:
What did we learn? What changed as a result? And how does this reduce risk going forward?